We are running an sql server database on a Windows 2000 server, aproximately
15 clients on our lan use odbc connections to connect with acces 2002 front
end. No problem. Then i came up with the idea to connect a home-worker via
internet, using a vpn tunnel over isdn. Somehow this vpn-over-isdn
connection is unstable, as a matter of fact only few records can be entered
before the connection is lost. Is this a limitation of odbc connections or
just a miserable isdn solution wich need to be replaced?"b.binnenweg" <bobby01@.nospamxs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:402e0d12$0$557$e4fe514c@.news.xs4all.nl...
> We are running an sql server database on a Windows 2000 server,
aproximately
> 15 clients on our lan use odbc connections to connect with acces 2002
front
> end. No problem. Then i came up with the idea to connect a home-worker via
> internet, using a vpn tunnel over isdn. Somehow this vpn-over-isdn
> connection is unstable, as a matter of fact only few records can be
entered
> before the connection is lost. Is this a limitation of odbc connections or
> just a miserable isdn solution wich need to be replaced?
>
That sounds like a connection issue... are you experiencing high latency
from the client to the server? Also, linked Access tables are not that
efficient and not recommended for WAN access.
Steve
Showing posts with label aproximately15. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aproximately15. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)